United States: When it comes to US waters, the EPA believes the eighth time will be the charm
To print this article, simply register or connect to Mondaq.com.
This morning, Juan Carlos Rodriguez reports in Law 360 what EPA administrator Regan had previously suggested – that the Biden administration apparently thinks the eighth time can really be the charm when it comes to the EPA’s efforts to determine the scope of Federal Clean Water Act by regulation.
In pending litigation in Massachusetts challenging the EPA’s seventh attempt, the EPA asked the Federal Court to remand the case to the EPA for further action and to maintain the seventh attempt as law in the interval.
It reminds me of a scene from the classic movie My cousin Vinny when Vinny says about passing the bar exam, “for me six times was the charm”. The difference is that Vinny passed the bar exam on this sixth attempt when there is absolutely no reason to believe that an eighth rule set by the EPA will do anything but lead to more litigation. and continued confusion in the longest-running controversy in environmental law.
Mr Rodriguez’s report covers all the bases well, except his story begins in the middle. It takes all the way back to the Carter administration to tell the full story of the EPA’s efforts to do through regulation what Congress has not done through legislation. Sadly, the only thing more unlikely than the possibility that the EPA’s eighth time was the charm is the possibility of Congress resolving the scope of the Federal Clean Water Act once and for all.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide on the subject. Specialist advice should be sought regarding your particular situation.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: United States Environment